Friday, September 22, 2006

this came in the mail today.



Don't label our girls 'easy', say angry convent schools


Ansley Ng
ansley@newstoday.com.sg

ELEVEN convent schools in Singapore have threatened legal action against Singapore Press Holdings (SPH) for an article that allegedly defamed convent schoolgirls.

Today has learnt that a lawyer's letter has been sent to the media company on Monday, demanding an apology and costs and damages to be paid for a "defamatory" article that was published in last week's Sunday Times, which described convent girls as being "easy" with members of the opposite sex.

Three days ago, The Sunday Times, the weekend edition of The Straits Times, published a story titled "Singapore A-Z … once more, with feeling", a "tongue in cheek" look at Singapore icons and subjects which coincided with the recently-launched Singapore — the Encyclopaedia.

Under the alphabet "I", the newspaper ran a short description of "IJ girls", term for girls who study in CHIJ (Convent of the Holy Infant Jesus) Catholic mission schools.

"'IJ girls' is a generalisation for girls who study in CHIJ schools and who like to hem their school uniforms real short, wear their belts real low on their hips, and are allegedly easy when it comes to the opposite sex," a paragraph read.
A cartoon above the paragraph also showed a girl in blue lighting up a cigarette.

"Singaporeans perusing our pages should note that this is done in tongue-in-cheek," one part of the article read.
According to sources, a letter of demand was sent to SPH on Monday, asking for an apology to be published in this weekend's edition of The Sunday Times.

It also demanded that costs and damages to be paid to the Infant Jesus Board of Management, which manages the 11 schools.

The board comprises 14 members, including two nuns, eight former students and four men, who are linked to the schools.
The story upset many alumni and parents and the board members were believed to have received more than 50 phone calls and email messages of complaint between them.

Yesterday, The Straits Times letters pages published a letter written by Donne Marie Aeria — the board's chairperson — rebutting the story.

Ms Aeria called the article "an ill-conceived idea and done in bad taste".
"Was there a need to tarnish the image of thousands of students, past, present and future, including girls as young as six years old in Primary 1, with an image that they are 'allegedly easy when it comes to the opposite sex'?" Ms Aeria wrote.

"It has caused much distress, pain and embarrassment to ladies of all ages, that hail from our CHIJ schools."
There are currently about 16,000 girls studying in the 11 primary and secondary CHIJ schools.

SPH declined to comment when contacted.

Aljunied GRC MP Cynthia Phua, who studied in CHIJ Secondary School (Toa Payoh), called the generalisation "insensitive".
"Eleven schools are all wearing the same uniform. It's too much if you see one case and generalise," said Mrs Phua, whose daughter is studying at CHIJ Primary School (Toa Payoh).

"If (The Sunday Times) wants to stick to its comment, they should clarify who their sources are."
Sunday Times article tarnished our image: CHIJ chairperson

i am nadi; :] at 11:53 PM

8comments

8 Comments

at 1:26 AM Anonymous Anonymous said...

yeapp. i read tt article too. and i was telling myself tt nad sure have a looooooooot to day bou tthis. hahaha and true enuff!

 
at 11:02 AM Blogger i am nadi; :] said...

haha of course lah! see! all 11 schools took action k!

 
at 7:02 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

IJ GIRLS forever NADI!

we shall fight back!!!

when we haf the time..

haha..
miss u!!!

 
at 12:33 AM Blogger i am nadi; :] said...

haha yea man! dont anyhow say say us okay! we bonding bonding wan har! dont play ah!

but yah. when we actually have the bloody time lah.

haha.

missing u too beat :)

 
at 10:14 PM Anonymous Anonymous said...

they sure dont knw nuffin bout us IJ girls.bah!

 
at 1:40 AM Blogger i am nadi; :] said...

right on wohman.

 
at 1:40 AM Blogger i am nadi; :] said...

right on wohman.

 
at 1:40 AM Blogger i am nadi; :] said...

right on wohman.

 

Post a Comment


extras